As the conclusion of my previous post indicated, I will limit myself to a few additional comments on this subject. (I’m trying to oblige Bryan L, who recently lodged a legitimate complaint against long-winded posts. ;-)) Jim’s desire to essentially restrict public commentary upon biblical subjects to properly credentialed individuals leads to corollary questions regarding the precise nature of such credentials. As the semi-official “Complete List of Biblioblogs” compiled and updated by the Biblioblog Top 50 readily indicates, the current crop of bibliobloggers represent a wide array of backgrounds, expertise, and interests. Some have completed their educational training and serve as college and university faculty or as independent researchers; some (such as myself) hold one or more advanced degrees in biblical studies or a cognate field but have not yet completed their schooling; some are just embarking upon the academic path and are chronicling their journeys from the beginning; some are devoted amateurs with a special passion for the subject. Members of this last category with whom I am most familiar include the aforementioned Bryan L, Loren Rosson, Peter Lopez, and Nick Norelli. Their thoughts, comments, and questions have expanded my personal reflections upon the anatomy, history, and interpretation of the Bible in innumerable ways, even in areas where we ultimately reached different conclusions or adopted different positions. Nick, in particular, has taught me a great deal not only through his insightful posts but also through his personal exemplification of what a kind, committed, engaged, and honest interpreter should look like. (Well, most of the time. ;-)) He has done this despite a total lack of formal training in religious studies, or even an undergraduate degree in any subject. If asked, I suspect he would be the first to tell you that he is by no means an authority on the topics about which he writes, merely someone moved to continually develop and share his views on the biblical text in light of its profound impact in his own life. There is much to be learned from these unconventional exegetes, who are willing and able to explore the findings of modern scholarship and to expand its relevance beyond the boundaries of the academy. Indeed, without their participation and multiplication the yawning chasm between “scholarship” and “faith” which plagues so many Christian denominations and which prevents so many people from thinking and talking about God in new and beneficial ways will never be successfully bridged.
I could certainly continue on this issue at length, and perhaps I’ll reserve the right to make additional comments at some future time. But for now I’ll quit before allowing myself to become too long-winded!